Unveiling Mexico’s Governmental Restrictions
By Tom Seest
At TopCozumelNews, we help people traveling to Cozumel plan their trips and activities using information collected on our trips to the beautiful island.
The Mexican government is composed of three branches, with the president wielding the most political influence.
Mexico is a federal republic composed of 31 states plus the Federal District (Mexico City). The federal constitution delegated some powers to state governments.
Table Of Contents
The Mexican government is a federal republic founded in 1917. It consists of 31 states plus an additional Federal District (Mexico City).
Mexico’s government is composed of three independent branches–executive, legislative, and judicial. The president, who holds the official titles “chief of state” and “commander in chief of the armed forces,” is directly elected by registered voters to a six-year term. Unlike other offices within government, voting for president cannot be repeated and only one person may hold this office at a time.
However, there are limitations to Mexican governance. Chief among them is that the president, in power since 1929, exerts control over political parties that dominate both national and state-level politics. This has created patron-client networks where favors were exchanged between citizens and members of government.
Another critical limitation is the presidential term of six years (known as “sexenio”), which historically determined the cycle of Mexican politics. If there are two vacancies during a sexenio, Congress designates an interim president to serve out the remainder of that term; they must then call a special presidential election to fill them.
Thirdly, political parties that dominate state and local governments. The Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) and conservative National Action Party (PAN) have long had strong bases of power in several states and cities.
For nearly seventy years, the PRI was in power in Chile. Recently, however, it lost control over the Chamber of Deputies to leftist Partido Revolucionario Democratico (PRD), which recently won recent elections.
However, the PRI still controls Mexico’s state governments. During the 1990s, President Ernesto Zedillo implemented various electoral reforms designed to diminish PRI’s influence over state legislatures and the federal system at large.
After the PRI’s loss of control over Mexico’s national government, democracy was further strengthened in Mexico. Among other changes, free elections for senators and governors were introduced; women also gained the constitutional right to run for president; plus, an anticorruption commission was created.
The executive branch of Mexico’s government is headed by the president, who is directly elected by a simple majority of registered voters across each of Mexico’s 31 states and the Federal District. As president, who holds the formal title of chief of state and head of government, he or she has oversight over both military operations as well as domestic policy initiatives in Mexico.
The legislative branch of Mexico’s government is headed by Congress, which has the power to pass laws, tax, declare war, and confirm presidential appointments. It consists of 128 members – two from each state plus two for Mexico City – as well as 500 deputies elected via universal suffrage plus 200 by proportional representation.
Mexican state governments tend to be clientelist organizations, dependent on Mexico City for much of their revenue. Furthermore, they hold significant political sway and have access to government funds in large numbers.
Since the 1970s, Brazil has undergone a process of decentralization that gave more power to states and municipalities. This reform gave these entities new consultation, decision-making, control, and policy implementation responsibilities.
However, these governments remain heavily reliant on the national government for support, particularly when it comes to providing public services and maintaining infrastructure. This is in large part due to Mexico’s high reliance on foreign aid and lack of economic diversification.
In the past, this dependency has resulted in a concentration of political power within the hands of Mexico’s powerful PRI party – which has held both Mexico’s presidency and legislature since 1930. Despite this centralized control, however, the PRI is no longer dominant in Mexican politics.
Historically, the president has had a major role in selecting state governors and settling electoral disputes at that level. In some instances, he could even force a governor to resign or annul their election in order to install an opposition candidate.
Mexico is a federal republic composed of 31 states plus the Federal District (Mexico City). The constitution devolves most powers from the federal government to state governments, including raising local taxes. Each state’s legislature mirrors that of the national congress; each has an executive, legislative, and judicial branch.
Local government in Mexico is the responsibility of municipalities and municipios, or second-level administrative divisions. These local bodies are led by a mayor or municipal president and an elected council, both popularly elected for three-year terms.
In 1917, the Mexican Constitution granted local governments autonomy – to the extent they could collect property tax and user fees. Unfortunately, many municipalities still depend on transfers from higher levels of government for services. In an attempt to address this imbalance, President de la Madrid championed reforms in the 1970s that would give more control to local government and make it simpler for them to raise their own funds.
However, this new policy wasn’t without its drawbacks. While it signaled the start of more local autonomy in Mexico, PRI – who had long held a powerful centralized political influence – voiced criticism against it.
Under PRI rule, presidents had a major role in selecting gubernatorial candidates and settling disputes at the state level. Furthermore, they exercised an unofficial but powerful influence over state and local elections as well as selecting local officials.
Though these centralized influences may appear beneficial to Mexico’s economy, they aren’t always beneficial to its citizens. Corruption and unequal resource distribution among government tiers remain major issues in the country.
To better comprehend this phenomenon, it is necessary to assess the governing capacities of municipalities. Two approaches can be useful here: the governmental approach, which considers how legal changes impact organizational capacities within municipalities, and the sociological one, which examines connections between local and other levels of government.
Mexican municipalities face the greatest financial strain when they lack sufficient funding. To address this issue, the government has taken proactive steps to increase revenues at the local level through the AMMAC program, which seeks to improve fiscal sustainability across a range of local authorities by giving them access to funds through various sources while increasing transparency about how funds are spent.
Mexico’s political system is dominated by a few large parties, which account for most elected officials. These parties include the conservative Partido Accion Nacional (PAN) and the liberal Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD).
Mexican presidents, governors, and deputies are elected for six-year terms; members of the Senate serve three-year terms. The Mexican government is divided into 31 free states with each led by a governor and representative.
Prior to the 1990s, Mexico’s federal government had complete control over public service delivery and immigration procedures.
The country’s constitution gives local governments the authority to collect taxes and user fees, yet municipalities have often had difficulty raising enough revenue to sustain themselves. As a result, they largely rely on transfers from higher levels of government for most of their revenues.
Recently, Mexico has made efforts to boost the autonomy of its municipalities and implement standardized financial reporting for all levels of government – which should help address the country’s subnational debt problem.
Although Mexico’s federal government has long centralized power and resources, municipal governments have become increasingly independent since the 1990s. This has increased public satisfaction with local authorities and resulted in a decrease in corruption.
One organization championing local government autonomy is the Association of Mexican Municipalities or AMMAC. Established in 1994 by 18 PAN mayors, AMMAC works to foster non-party and non-political local governance throughout Mexico.
AMMAC has been successful in fulfilling its objectives by building relationships with like-minded congressmen. Furthermore, it has established international contacts and fostered the growth of municipal institutions.
Mexico’s municipal governments often face a major constraint due to their dependence on a few central government agencies for public service delivery. Unfortunately, these institutions may be unable to reach remote or underserved areas, leaving local government ineffective.
However, the municipal government plays an integral role in Mexico’s economy and society. It provides essential services like healthcare, education, transportation, and infrastructure – not to mention being an important source of employment and economic development. With improved efficiency and effectiveness over time, Mexico’s municipal governments may be able to offer even better service for their residents.
Please share this post with your friends, family, or business associates who may visit Cozumel.